While AMD’s 400- and 500-series Polaris graphics card were great value GPUs, they were aimed at budget-conscious gamers. This meant that Nvidia’s high-end 10 series cards have remained unchallenged…until now. With AMD’s new Vega GPU architecture, the company is back in the enthusiast mix and asserts that its RX Vega 64 graphics card will be competitive with Nvidia’s $550 GeForce GTX 1080 for $50 less. We’re going to put that claim to the test in our review.
Subscribe to GameSpot!
Visit all of our channels:
Features & Reviews –
Video Game Trailers –
Movies, TV, & Comics –
Gameplay & Guides –
Mobile Gaming –
Like –
Follow –
Nguồn: https://laneletters.com/
Xem thêm bài viết khác: https://laneletters.com/cong-nghe/
Xem thêm Bài Viết:
- Đánh giá bo mạch chủ ASRock Z490 Steel Legend
- Fix "doc-08-1g-docs.googleusercontent.com was denied" in Google Drive
- Gentle Rain Sounds on Window use for Relaxing, Studying, Meditation | Rain on Window
- Fast Ruby on Rails 5 Bootstrap Tutorial
- RAFT CRACKED + MULTIPLAYER WORKS 100% DOWNLOAD NEW UPDATE 2020
Is it important for you to have a VR capable GPU?
I have this card and gotta say it’s a beast
A 64 beats a 1080 now
I would have bought a gtx if i did not have a mac.
Must have been something wacky with those first Drivers because if you did those same tests now you would see a high difference. Oh and undervolting does dramatically reduce power usage..
I am very happy with my 1080, thanks.
I’ll be honest the main reason I’m gonna get RX Vega 64 is because I like amd
Instead of a 1080
I️ got If for same price as 1070 so zero f’s given
Where are the 4k fps results?
just got a vega 64, I upgraded from a nvidia 980ti g1, Reason i didnt go for a 1080ti or a 1080 are simple,
I bought a 980ti for USD 910, and i am surprised how quickly nvidia decided to stop supporting it, Total war warhammer 1 and 2 use the same engine and the same visuals, but my fps took a severe hit in tw2, I am glad i am out of greedvidia's camp.
Not supporting the Nvidia mafia: Priceless
Probably the king of the current crop of pro-HD segment
yes
Is it worth it if I'm considering a Freesync monitor @ 1440p 144hz? G-Sync is pricey.
Hm here in germany the Vega costs 100 € more than my GTX 1080.
Apparently this device the rx vega couldnd be in PlayStation 4 pro advanced dnt think would be a good move on sonys part or the gx
Get better benchmarks.. like seriously?
AMD took 1 and half year for this shit ?!?! WTAcualF
Personally I will just wait till a 3rd party company comes in and do their own tweaks on it 👍
Early adopters miss out on AIB versions and improved drivers. I'm happy to wait and see where they go.
1080 better than Vega and more cheaper. Maybe they beat Intel but Nvidia will stand up
GTX 1080 killer? FUCK YOU that shit is from mid 2016!!! how dare you!! n000bs
The answer is nope its not!
GTX 1080 killer? NO, power plant killer? YES
Funny, they just announced an 20% rise in price after a while. The 500$ is an "early adopter" price.
I don't care about what shit you have to say, just show us numbers and graphs. In more extensive tests its showed that Vega and the GTX 1080 trade a lot of blows across a large list of games. I'd recommend a visit to Hardware Unboxed to anybody who reads this. Vega has had a confusing and perhaps to some hoping for a lot, a lackluster release, but this video doesn't do it justice. The potential and price/performance are there.
The price is misleading, Vega prices are actually much higher in reality so the 1070 and 1080 are by far the better deals.
Ryzen and Threadripper are priced aggressively , RX Vega is no.
50 less? It costs 650€ 😀
I will wait the next generation
1080 good 56 bade
lol in sweden and DK, rx vega 64 is not cheaper than gtx 1080 lol
Better have a huge Power Supply for this.
is the vega 64 better than the 1080 ti?
Very bad review. Stop playing in Nvidia's backyard: don't test MafiaWorks games and Nvidia-friendly graphic engines.
This is crap.
clickbait
lol competing with 2 year old cards. ok!
You can get a GTX 1080 for $500 though. It's $509 now on newegg
Why don't show all the damn fps numbers instead of telling us which gpu does better.
Once ethereum mining dies out, prices should come down pretty drastically. Until then, I wouldn't buy this (well I don't think I'll have to upgrade in a while, but for those who are considering it, perhaps you should hold off on that). Furthermore, this is the reference model, which is never good, so I wouldn't judge the heat dissipation of the Vega series based on this particular model either.
Who died and made gamespot a reliable source for computer hardware? Who's talking? Who wrote this? What are their qualifications. ps: these miner cards are not cheaper than 1080's, they are already retailing for more, unsurprisingly.
For 600$ i will choose xbox one x
So near 2 year hype of Vega by AMD was a joke. AMD's best could not topple NVIDIA's best yet again. Im starting to worry about future of AMD.
What this content , this channel going to dead
What about Vega 56?
AMD is bumping up the Radeon price next month. So, basically you're going to see them on-par if not more expensive than Nvidia GPUs for what amounts to slightly, slightly inferior performance.
I hope the price jump is just a stunt, I'd hate to see the bargain bin of AMD get obliterated by Nvidia.
so AMD GPU's still irrelevant….and Nvidia continuing to dominate the market.. that's really sad 🙁